Learn › REIT Basics · 5 min read

Internally vs. Externally Managed REITs

REITs are run either by an in-house team or by an outside management company paid a fee, which can shape incentives differently

Two ways a REIT can be run

Every REIT needs a management team to make decisions about acquisitions, leasing, financing, and day-to-day operations. How that management team is employed, directly by the REIT, or through a separate outside company, is one of the more consequential structural choices behind a REIT, and it falls into two broad categories: internally managed and externally managed.

Neither approach is unique to REITs, internal and external management are common structural choices across many kinds of investment vehicles, but the distinction gets particular attention in the REIT world because management decisions, especially around acquisitions and leverage, have such a direct effect on the dividend income shareholders rely on. The two categories are not always perfectly clean in practice; some REITs have moved from one model to the other over time, and hybrid arrangements occasionally exist, such as a REIT that internalizes some functions while still contracting out others.

Internally managed REITs

An internally managed REIT employs its executives and staff directly. Management works solely for that REIT, is typically compensated through a mix of salary and equity in the REIT itself, and reports to the REIT's own board of directors. Most large, long-established publicly traded equity REITs are internally managed today. See REIT Qualification Rules for the separate question of how a REIT qualifies for its tax status, which applies regardless of how it is managed.

Internal management became the more typical model in large part because of the same 1986 tax law change that let REITs operate their own properties directly, described in The History of REITs: once REITs could hire their own operating staff, many chose to bring management in-house as well, rather than relying on an external company for both.

Externally managed REITs

An externally managed REIT instead contracts with a separate management company, often an affiliate of the REIT's original sponsor, to handle its operations, in exchange for a management fee. That fee is often calculated as a percentage of assets under management or a similar metric, rather than being tied directly to shareholder returns. External management is more common among some non-traded REITs, mortgage REITs, and newer or smaller REITs that do not yet have the scale to justify building an in-house team.

External management is also common in the early life of a REIT, before it has grown large enough to support its own full management team, and some externally managed REITs later transition to internal management as they mature and gain scale. From a shareholder's perspective, the external management fee is an ongoing cost that reduces the income ultimately available for distribution, so it is one more line item worth understanding alongside a REIT's other operating expenses.

Why the distinction gets attention

The distinction draws attention mainly because of how incentives can line up. When management is paid based on growing the asset base, some investors argue that creates an incentive to grow for its own sake, even when a given acquisition may not clearly benefit shareholders, a type of conflict of interest sometimes discussed under the general heading of "agency costs." Internally managed REITs, where management's own equity compensation is tied to the same stock shareholders own, are often seen as better aligned by comparison, though internal management does not eliminate the possibility of poor decisions either. Externally managed structures can also offer real advantages, such as access to a sponsor's existing deal pipeline, industry relationships, or specialized expertise that would be expensive to build in-house.

Fee structures within external management agreements vary considerably: some include incentive fees tied to performance benchmarks, others include provisions for termination payments if the REIT ends the management contract, and the details of a specific agreement can matter as much as the internal-versus-external label itself. Neither structure guarantees good or bad outcomes on its own — it is one factor among several to understand when researching a REIT, alongside things like leverage and payout ratios; see How to Analyze a REIT and REIT Payout Ratios.

How to find out which one a REIT is

A REIT's management structure, including whether it is internally or externally managed and how any management fees are calculated, is disclosed in its public filings, such as its annual report and proxy statement. Shareholders of an externally managed REIT typically vote on certain matters related to the management agreement, and proxy advisory firms and investor groups sometimes focus specifically on management structure and fee terms when evaluating a REIT's governance.

This site's profile pages and the screener are a starting point for researching individual companies, and the glossary covers related terms like "management fee" and "sponsor."

See it in the data: Screen REITs by the numbers →

Research and education only — nothing here is investment advice. Figures such as the 90% distribution rule are general and can change; always confirm against a company's filings.